House rules
How this site works
Evidenced means one thing here: there is a primary source with an address you can open yourself. Everything else is marked as unevidenced instead of being wrapped in a sentence that sounds good.
What counts as evidence here
A statement is evidenced when there is a primary source with an address behind it — one you can open without taking our word for anything.
That way of working applies on every page, starting with crypto casino Austria.
On legal questions it is the statute itself, in the federal legal information system at ris.bka.gv.at, or the publication of the responsible authority. That is why the page on the legal position prints, beside every section number, what that section actually says. A section number we have not seen in the statute does not get written down — and that is not a flourish, it is the reason why several places on this site carry a sentence naming the gap instead of a figure.
On licences it is the record in the regulator's register, with the date it was queried. A seal in the footer of an operator's site is a picture and not evidence; which registers exist and how you query them yourself is set out on the page on the concession.
The Finanzamt Österreich grants the concession under §14 GSpG, and while one is in force no second may be issued. A licence from Curaçao, Malta or Anjouan is a different thing: a different grantor, a different supervisor, a different register. Both can be looked up, and that is exactly what separates them from a seal in the footer.
On an operator's own rules — withdrawal caps, deadlines, checking duties — it is the text the operator has published. What comparison sites claim about an operator does not count as a source here, at most as a pointer to where looking might be worthwhile.
How you spot the unevidenced
By the fact that it says so. These pages carry sentences like “we have not checked this”, “we have read no source for that” or “this is reported, but not looked up by us” — in the same paragraph as the statement they belong to, and not in a footnote far below it.
The reason is simple. A qualification that sits three screens below the claim is not a qualification. It is cover for the author. Whoever reads a statement should read how far it reaches at the same moment.
Why an empty place names its reason
In tables and short entries you will never find a bare dash here. A dash can mean anything at all, and the reader is left guessing. Instead the empty place names its reason, and the reasons differ in weight:
Not published. The operator gives no figure. That is information in itself — on withdrawal caps, for instance, a rather loud piece of it.
Not checked. A source exists; we have not opened it. Our gap, not the operator's.
Contradictory. Two sources say different things. It happens more often than you would think — two official registers of the same regulator can contradict each other on the same entry. In that case the contradiction is what gets printed, not one of the two figures.
Not reachable from here. A page would not load from our location. That does not mean it is blocked for you, and we do not claim it is.
The order of precedence when sources disagree
The statute and the authority's publication beat everything else. The regulator's register beats the operator's description of itself. The operator's published terms beat any summary of them — ours included. If you read something on one of our pages and something different in the operator's terms, the operator's terms apply and we have made a mistake.
What this site does not do
With two named exceptions it does not claim to have tested operators. On 28 August 2026 the editors deposited and withdrew real money at Vave, with no identity check up to a cumulative total of around 5,000 USDT. At TrustDice real money went in and out in May 2026, until the check set in after a cumulative total of around 5,000 US dollars in withdrawals — through Veriff, with the passport accepted only on the fifth attempt. Everything else on this site is read from published documents, not played. Where something has been worked out, the sum is printed with it so you can redo it — as on provably fair or on the checks to run on an operator.
It invents no figures. No section numbers, no deadlines, no amounts, no dates we have not seen.
It does not work with manufactured urgency. No countdowns, no offers that supposedly expire in four hours, no notes on how many people are reading along right now.
It does not explain how to get around a block. Neither masking your location nor signing up from a country other than your own is a subject here.
It links to no other casinos, not in lists and not as an example either.
And it gives neither legal nor tax advice. The tax page collects sources and says where they stop — more than that no text can do without knowing your case.
The commercial side
This site earns money. It advertises one operator, and if someone opens an account through an advertising link, a payment can follow from it. That is not hidden here, because hiding it would be the real dishonesty.
What does not follow from it: no statement about an operator is changed, dropped or softened because of it. A payment buys a placement, it does not buy a claim. In practice that means three things. Where something about the advertised operator is unevidenced, it says so exactly as it would for anyone else. Where a sum comes out against an offer — as with the no-deposit bonus — the result stands, although it does not help the sale. And there is no list here sorted by commission, because there are no rankings of several operators at all.
Mistakes
Texts about registers, statutes and operators' terms go out of date, faster than they can be written. If something here is wrong, then it is wrong — and it gets corrected, with the reason it was wrong. A figure changed in silence is not evidence, it is a second claim.
What these rules apply to, every page here shows on its own subject, beginning with crypto casinos in Austria.